- U.S. v. Cohen – Accused of orchestrating a multimillion-dollar PPP loan fraud scheme by falsifying bank records and business documents to obtain funds fraudulently. Initially labeled the mastermind, Cohen faced overwhelming evidence, including financial statements and witness testimony. The prosecution sought a sentence of up to 46 months in prison. However, Attorney Kirlew utilized a meticulous fraud defense strategy, negotiating a plea agreement that resulted in a significantly reduced sentence of just 366 days.
- U.S. v. Dublynn – Charged with healthcare fraud, Dublynn faced a potential 10-year prison sentence. Attorney Kirlew successfully argued for a 57% sentence reduction through expert case law analysis and strategic negotiation, reducing the sentence to 42 months. His experience in federal fraud litigation was instrumental in achieving this outcome.
- U.S. v. Mansaw – Indicted for money laundering in a multi-state PPP loan fraud scheme, Mansaw initially faced a 21-27 month sentence. Attorney Kirlew’s skillful negotiations and financial crimes defense strategies resulted in a reduced sentence of just four months.
- U.S. v. Hue – Accused of masterminding a major international drug trafficking operation, Hue faced a mandatory minimum of five years and a maximum of 20 years. Attorney Kirlew challenged key drug conspiracy evidence, leading to a waiver of the mandatory minimum and a significantly reduced 27-month sentence.
- State v. Ilochonwu—A rising figure in the music industry, Ilochonwu was accused of using stolen credit card data for luxury expenses. Despite digital forensics linking him to fraudulent transactions, Attorney Kirlew exposed procedural errors in the case, leading to a full dismissal.
Criminal Past Cases
Proven Results: Attorney Brian Kirlew’s Unmatched Criminal Defense Success
When your freedom is on the line, you need a relentless, strategic, and highly skilled defense attorney in your corner. Attorney Brian Kirlew has a proven track record of fighting—and winning—against overwhelming odds. From federal fraud cases to DUI charges, violent felonies, and wrongful accusations, Attorney Kirlew’s aggressive legal representation has secured dismissals, reduced sentences, and acquittals for countless clients.
Each case is unique, and past success does not guarantee future results. However, these victories highlight why Brian Kirlew is one of the most sought-after criminal defense lawyers in Miami and across Florida. His expertise in criminal defense law, white-collar crime, DUI defense, and violent felony representation ensures the best possible outcomes for his clients.
Homicide Defense
- State v. Reyes – Charged with second-degree murder, Reyes faced a mandatory 25-year sentence if convicted at trial. The prosecution relied on eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence, both of which Attorney Kirlew meticulously examined for inconsistencies. Through aggressive cross-examination of state witnesses and a deep dive into the forensic analysis, Attorney Kirlew highlighted contradictions in the state’s case, weakening their argument. After three years of rigorous legal battles, Attorney Kirlew negotiated a plea deal that reduced the charge to manslaughter with a 10-year sentence, ensuring his client avoided a potential lifetime in prison.
- State v. Gunera – Facing the death penalty for a cold-case homicide, Gunera’s case was one of the most challenging Attorney Kirlew had encountered. The prosecution heavily relied on testimony from a single cooperating witness. Through tireless investigation, Attorney Kirlew uncovered evidence of misconduct in witness handling and improper law enforcement procedures, undermining the credibility of the state’s case. After years of relentless legal strategy, he successfully negotiated a plea deal for 12 years instead of life or the death penalty, saving his client from execution.
- State v. Pierre – At just 16 years old, Pierre was accused of a double homicide and faced life without parole. The prosecution presented alleged confessions and relied on circumstantial evidence. Attorney Kirlew challenged the reliability of these confessions, arguing that Pierre had been subjected to unlawful interrogation tactics. Additionally, his deep dive into forensic evidence revealed discrepancies that led to doubts regarding the case. After extensive litigation, Attorney Kirlew successfully had both murder charges dismissed, reducing his client’s exposure to life imprisonment.
- State v. Lazo – Charged with first-degree murder in a domestic dispute, Lazo was accused of a crime that carried a mandatory life sentence. The prosecution argued that Lazo’s DNA was found on the victim, making their case appear strong. However, Attorney Kirlew, through meticulous forensic scrutiny and expert testimony, demonstrated that the DNA evidence was inconclusive and lacked proper handling, raising significant doubt about the validity of the state’s claims. His defense strategy resulted in a plea agreement that reduced the charge significantly, securing an 8-year sentence instead of life imprisonment.
- State v. Patterson – Charged with attempted murder, Patterson faced life in prison after allegedly opening fire on a rival in a highly publicized altercation. The prosecution had surveillance footage and multiple witness statements pointing to his involvement. Attorney Kirlew meticulously dissected the video footage, proving that Patterson acted in self-defense. By bringing in forensic experts and presenting a compelling narrative of events, Kirlew successfully dismantled the state’s case. Ultimately, a 5-year plea deal was negotiated, significantly reducing the initial life sentence Patterson was facing.
- State v. Marc – Facing first-degree murder with a detailed confession, Marc appeared to have little hope of acquittal. However, Attorney Kirlew’s sharp legal mind identified constitutional violations in the interrogation process, leading to the suppression of Marc’s confession. By further challenging forensic inconsistencies and the credibility of witnesses, Kirlew successfully secured a full acquittal, with Marc being found not guilty.
- State v. Velazquez – Charged with first-degree murder, Velazquez allegedly shot an individual during a neighborhood dispute. The prosecution portrayed him as an aggressor, but Attorney Kirlew demonstrated that the incident was a stand your ground self-defense case. His detailed investigation, use of expert testimony, and persuasive arguments in court led to a plea deal reducing the charge to aggravated assault with a firearm, resulting in probation and immediate release.
Violent Crime Defense
- State v. Washington – Charged with aggravated assault with a firearm, Washington was facing a mandatory prison term. The prosecution sought to establish that he knowingly possessed a weapon at the time of the incident. Attorney Kirlew meticulously reviewed police procedures and ballistic reports, revealing gaps in the prosecution’s evidence. He successfully argued that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Washington was aware of the firearm’s presence in his vehicle, leading to a not guilty verdict on all counts.
- State v. Crawford – Accused of armed robbery, Crawford faced severe sentencing with potential decades in prison. Attorney Kirlew’s cross-examination of prosecution witnesses exposed critical contradictions, leading to doubts about the reliability of the evidence. He also presented alibi witnesses and video evidence proving Crawford was elsewhere at the time of the crime. After only 15 minutes of jury deliberation, Crawford was found not guilty.
- State v. Williams – Facing vehicular manslaughter and a potential life sentence, Williams’ case was one of the most challenging in Attorney Kirlew’s career. The prosecution relied on forensic evidence, traffic surveillance footage, and an alleged confession. However, Attorney Kirlew meticulously challenged the scientific accuracy of the forensic evidence, questioned law enforcement’s handling of the case, and raised constitutional issues surrounding Williams’ interrogation. His aggressive defense strategy resulted in a plea deal significantly below the original sentencing expectations, sparing his client from a life sentence.
- State v. Torre – Torre was facing life imprisonment for violating his probation on a kidnapping and sexual battery conviction. The prosecution argued that Torre’s flight to another country was an admission of guilt. Attorney Kirlew developed a comprehensive defense strategy highlighting procedural errors in the original conviction and mitigating circumstances surrounding his client’s departure from the country. After intense negotiations, Kirlew secured a plea deal for 364 days in jail, allowing Torre to return to the U.S. as a free man.
- State v. Payoute – Payoute and an alleged accomplice were accused of robbing an elderly man at a North Miami dry cleaner on two separate occasions. The victim was certain about his identification of Payoute, but Attorney Kirlew effectively cross-examined the victim and law enforcement, uncovering contradictions in testimony. Payoute was acquitted, and the state dropped an additional armed robbery with a firearm charge the following day.
- State v. Roscoe – Roscoe was accused of aggravated battery after allegedly smashing a coffee cup on the victim’s head, causing severe lacerations. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, but Attorney Kirlew exposed discrepancies in the victim’s story and presented a witness who testified that the victim initiated the altercation. Roscoe faced a mandatory 30-year sentence, but the jury returned a not guilty verdict in under 30 minutes.
- Attorney Brian Kirlew has successfully defended clients against some of the most complex homicide, aggravated assault, attempted murder, and violent felony charges in Miami and across Florida. His relentless advocacy, deep legal knowledge, and superior courtroom tactics have led to countless acquittals, reduced sentences, and dismissed charges.
Drug Crime Defense
- State v. Johnson – Johnson was arrested for drug trafficking and faced a mandatory three-year sentence. The prosecution relied on the testimony of a confidential informant with a history of deception. Attorney Kirlew challenged the informant’s credibility and highlighted investigative misconduct, resulting in a plea to probation instead of a prison term. His expertise in narcotics defense and constitutional law violations ensured that his client avoided severe penalties and maintained his future prospects.
- State v. McKinney – Accused of trafficking heroin and marijuana, McKinney faced significant prison time. Law enforcement testified that he discarded a package of drugs, but Attorney Kirlew dismantled their credibility and exposed gaps in the chain of custody. His meticulous approach to evidence analysis and cross-examination of forensic experts led to a full acquittal, reinforcing his reputation as a top Miami drug crimes attorney.
DUI Defense
- State v. Scott – Accused of DUI with controlled substances, Scott faced an automatic license suspension and possible jail time. The prosecution relied on toxicology reports, but Attorney Kirlew successfully challenged the testing methods, arguing lab contamination and unreliable handling of samples. His aggressive defense resulted in the suppression of toxicology evidence, leading to a complete dismissal of all charges.
- State v. Paz – Arrested for DUI after being found unconscious in his car, Paz faced a strong case from the prosecution, which included video footage and police testimony. Attorney Kirlew exposed inconsistencies in the field sobriety test administration and demonstrated that medical conditions contributed to his client’s condition. His well-planned defense strategies resulted in a not guilty verdict, reinforcing his expertise in DUI defense strategies.
- State v. Contreras – Despite refusing all sobriety tests, Contreras was charged with DUI and risked harsh penalties. Attorney Kirlew meticulously analyzed dashcam footage and pointed out inconsistencies in officer reports and field sobriety test results. His in-depth understanding of Florida DUI laws and police procedure violations convinced the jury, who returned a not guilty verdict in just 10 minutes.
- State v. Romero – Charged with DUI and reckless driving, Romero’s case seemed difficult to defend, given the police reports detailing erratic behavior. Attorney Kirlew discredited the field sobriety test results, arguing that bad weather conditions and poor road visibility affected Romero’s driving. His sharp legal acumen led to a full acquittal, showcasing his unmatched skills in traffic-related criminal defense.
- State v. Shaw – Shaw was arrested for impersonating a police officer and illegally carrying a firearm. The prosecution built their case on witness testimony and forensic evidence, but Attorney Kirlew exposed discrepancies in police reports and cross-examined key witnesses to prove reasonable doubt. His rigorous defense resulted in a full dismissal of all charges, reaffirming his excellence in firearms and impersonation defense cases.
- State v. Santana – Accused of battery on a law enforcement officer, Santana’s charges carried severe consequences, including potential imprisonment. Attorney Kirlew highlighted discrepancies in officer statements, exposing contradictions that cast doubt on the prosecution’s case. His fierce advocacy resulted in a not guilty verdict, protecting his client’s rights and freedom.
Contact The Kirlew Law Firm Today
If you or a loved one are facing DUI charges, drug crimes, violent felonies, or federal fraud accusations, don’t wait to secure top-rated criminal defense representation. Attorney Brian Kirlew has the expertise, strategic approach, and relentless commitment to defending your rights and freedom.
Call Now: 305-521-0484
Visit: www.kirlewlawfirm.com
Location: Miami, FL
Your defense starts here—because your future matters.
© Copyright 2025 The Kirlew Law Firm. All rights reserved.
Digital Marketing By 